SCHOOL OF SOCIAL
WORK
CLINICAL SOCIAL WORK
PRACTICE I
Joseph
Walsh, Instructor
Office
Hours: Tuesday 11:00 Ð 2:00,
Room
319 Raleigh Building and by appointment
828-8208
(W); 745-6365 (H) e-mail:
jwalsh@atlas.vcu.edu
Students with disabilities, who may need
an accommodation to participate and maximize learning in this course, should
contact the instructor promptly to discuss this issue.
Students are expected to abide by the policies
of the VCU Honor System. These policies are published annually in the
University Resource Guide.
Advanced Clinical Social Work Practice I.
Semester course, 3 lecture hours, 3 credits. Pre- and/or co-requisites:
Completion of Foundation Curriculum & SLWK 703. First of two courses on
advanced clinical practice with individuals, families, couples, and groups.
Extends knowledge and skills obtained in foundation courses. Continues a
multi-theoretical orientation to intervention across fields of practice with
emphasis on contemporary psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral approaches and
their empirical support. Emphasizes multidimensional assessment and the
differential application of therapeutic, supportive, educational, and resource
management strategies to complex problems of children, youth, and adults.
Examines the interdisciplinary context of practice and the impact of diversity
on clinical practice. Introduces topics in psychopharmacology related to social
work intervention.
At the completion of this course, the
student will be able to:
1. Understand
the contemporary roles of the advanced clinical social work practitioner across
fields of practice and within an interdisciplinary context.
2. Understand
the characteristics of the clinical relationship and the dynamics, such as age,
race, gender, sexual orientation, and
socioeconomic status, which influence it.
3. Understand
the role of supervision, consultation, and self-evaluation as tools of continuing
professional development.
4. Understand
and critically analyze the role of theory in advanced clinical social work
practice and the need for multidimensional assessment and multi-theoretical
interventions.
5. Describe
and critique salient features of psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioral
approaches to clinical practice in social work, including the major concepts
and propositions underlying each.
6. Trace
the history, development, and relevance of psychodynamic and cognitive- behavioral
theoretical orientations in the field of social work.
7. Be
familiar with major models of assessment and evaluation based on psychodynamic
and cognitive-behavioral theoretical orientations in the field of social work.
8. Select,
use, and evaluate the processes of intervention derived from psychodynamic and
cognitive-behavioral approaches.
9. Develop
and evaluate the processes of intervention derived from psychodynamic and
cognitive-behavioral approaches.
10. Demonstrate
an awareness of ethical and value dilemmas in the delivery of clinical social
work services and the skills to move toward conflict resolution.
11. Integrate
knowledge of human behavior, research, and foundation content through the use
of critical thinking skills.
12. Demonstrate
knowledge of the role of psychopharmacology in the delivery of services to
children, adolescents, and adults including the roles of the social worker in
medication management.
Goldstein, E. G. (1995). Ego
psychology and social work practice (2nd. ed.). New York: Free Press.
Leahy, R. L. (1996). Cognitive
therapy: Basic principles and applications. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Reid, K. E. (1997). Social work practice with groups: A clinical perspective (2nd ed). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Unit I Defining clinical social work: Contemporary roles in advanced
clinical social work; The use of theory across practice roles (therapeutic,
supportive, educational, resource management); An introduction to clinical
relationships with individuals, couples, groups, and families, and to a
multi-theoretical approach; Interdisciplinary practice.
Unit II Psychodynamic theories and their application: Concepts,
propositions, history, use, critical analysis, and empirical support of
self-psychology, object relations, and ego psychology; Assessment principles
and tools; Application to individuals, couples, groups, and families including
planning, goal formulation, intervention, evaluation, and termination.
Unit III Cognitive Behavioral
theory and its application: Concepts, propositions, history, use, critical
analysis, and empirical support of social learning and cognitive theories;
Assessment principles and tools; Application to individuals, couples, groups,
and families including planning, goal formulation, intervention, evaluation,
and termination.
This is pretty much a Òno frillsÓ course.
As you have probably heard, I lead the dullest life of anyone on the faculty. I
am well known for lacking imagination, and was in fact hired at a time when the
School needed a Midwestern ÒhayseedÓ to round out its multicultural
representation.
I believe that solid clinical practice
skills are best developed through reading about theories and their
applications, struggling with their logical, empirical, and practical
bases, and applying them in the classroom and to clinical practice in
the field and workplace. Our class sessions will thus consist of:
a. Instructor
lectures
b. Student
reports of field placement activities
c. Role-play
activities
d. Discussion
of the readings and homework assignments
e. Occasional
video presentations.
A heavy emphasis in this course is the
integration and transfer of learning to the field. I encourage your sharing of
field and work experiences.
I expect that you will read for each class
period and be prepared to discuss the readings from the perspective of your
field placement or related clinical experiences. Class lectures and discussions
will not necessarily cover all of the assigned readings, as I will attempt to
respond to the particular needs and interests of students in focusing classroom
activity.
You may meet with me during office hours
or other arranged times to:
a. Ask
questions about the course material and assignments
b. Review
graded work
c. Get
suggestions for further reading
d. Discuss
other topics related to the course or to the social work profession in general,
and
e. Talk
informally about any other concerns (including the poetry of Emily Dickinson
and the history of rock and roll music).
It is not necessary to make an
appointment to meet during my office hours, although students who do so will
have priority in case of conflicts. Regarding phone availability, you are
encouraged to call my office during daytime hours, as I check my messages daily
when I am not in. However, if I cannot be reached, and particularly if the
matter is of some urgency, do not hesitate to call me at home, but not after
9:00 p.m. (when I am tired and getting ready for bed)
All students must complete the practice
theory application paper (at the end of the semester), and the attendance
and participation grade also applies to all students. Otherwise you have
choices regarding course assignments, selecting any two of the five
ÒoptionsÓ described below.
Keep in mind when selecting assignments
that there is variation in their due dates, as noted in their full descriptions
and on the weekly class schedule. You must inform me in writing of the
assignments you choose by September 26, the fourth class of the semester. I
will provide all students with an assignment agreement form for that
purpose.
Option
A: Practice theory concept paper 30%
Option
B: Field placement journal 30%
Option
C: Two quizzes 30%
Option
D: The intervention videotape 30%
Option
E: Annotated bibliography 30%
Practice
theory application paper (required) 30%
Class
attendance and participation 10%
The course grading scale is based
on ten percentage points, so that 90-100% = A, 80-89.9% = B, 70-79.9% = C,
60-69.9% = D, and below 60% is failing.
In evaluating the written assignments, I
use the following guidelines:
A: All
or most aspects of the work are outstanding with regard to my normal
expectations of students.
B: All
content requirements are met and the overall quality is good.
C: Most
content requirements are met but some are not adequately developed.
D - F: Major
content areas of the assignment are not addressed or are not adequately developed.
All papers must be typed and double-spaced
using one-inch margins, 12-point font, and APA reference style.
Specific grading criteria are included with each assignment.
Students must limit the length of
their papers in accordance with the instructions for each assignment.
Written assignments must be turned in no
later than the class period of the due date unless I approve an extension. Late
papers may be lowered by up to one letter grade per week.
Extensions on assignments can be
negotiated, so donÕt be shy about asking!
CLASS ATTENDANCE AND
PARTICIPATION
Attendance and participation counts
for 10% of the course grade. The participatory nature of this course leads
to my expectation that you attend every class session in its entirety. In this
way you assume responsibility for helping to create a mutual learning environment
for all of us. Your participation is further encouraged because social workers
typically function in agencies as team members, and need to develop the ability
to defend their perspectives and challenge those of others in a spirit of
collaborative learning. If you cannot attend a class, please inform me in
advance if possible.
Each studentÕs classroom comments
should reflect sensitivity to the feelings of classmates and be constructive in
tone.
A Ònon-gradedÓ portion of this assignment
involves each student, with a classmate, leading a 10-15 minute discussion
of the major points of one weekÕs readings. That is, the two students, who
sign up in advance for a particular week, will prepare 3-4 questions for
informal class discussion as a way of introducing the new material. I will
distribute a sign-up sheet for this purpose. This is no big deal Ð donÕt
get stressed about it Ð itÕs just a way to generate student participation!
All students begin the semester with 8
out of a possible 10 points for the attendance and participation grade. One
point will be deducted for any missed class. At the end of the semester, one or
two additional points may be added to your grade to recognize a significant
level of participation in class discussions.
No student who misses more than five
classes can receive a passing grade for the course.
(To be given October 18 and November 29,
both Tuesdays, from 11:15-12:00)
Two short-answer essay quizzes will be
given during the semester, one on ego psychology and the other on
cognitive/behavior theory. Each quiz will consist of six questions, of which
you must answer any five, based on the reading assignments and class
discussions. The quizzes will take no more than 45 minutes to complete and
must be taken outside of the class hours on those dates (or as arranged
with the instructor). A range of possible questions will be distributed in
class in advance of the quiz dates. Each question will be worth 20 points
toward the final grade. Responses will be graded on the following criteria:
Inclusion
of relevant content 50%
Appropriate
use of concepts 50%
(4-5 pages long, due October 24)
All practice theories include major
concepts (abstract ideas) which guide the actions of the practitioner. For this
assignment, first choose a concept from a practice theory that interests you.
Your choice may include
From ego psychology -
Countertransference, defensive functions (any of those not highlighted in
class), developmental reflection, direct influence, drive, education, ego
functions (any), exploration/description/ventilation, insight, mastery and
competence, person-situation reflection, object relations, sustaining,
structuring, transference.
By the time this assignment is due, we
will not have covered the cognitive or behavior theories in any detail.
However, if you have an interest in one of these theories, feel free to select
your topic from the list below. I will be happy to work with you to develop the
topic.
From cognitive theory Ð Automatic
thoughts, cognitive distortions, core beliefs, emotion, problem solving,
schema, self-talk.
From behavior theory Ð Conditioning
(operant or classical), modeling, punishment, rehearsal, reinforcement.
Once you have selected a concept:
1. Define
and describe the concept (1 page) (25% of the total grade)
2. Describe
how the concept may be utilized in both the assessment (25%) and intervention
phases (25%) of work with clients (2-3 pages).
3. Discuss
limitations, if any, of the concept in providing a basis for understanding
clientsÕ problem situations in your interest area or agency setting (1 page)
(15%)
The remaining 10% of the grade will be
based on the quality of the paperÕs citations and
organization.
Your paper should demonstrate evidence of
familiarity with the literature about the chosen concept. At least six
citations are required for this assignment, and at least three must be from
sources other than the textbooks.
(5-7 pages long, due November 7)
From the third through the tenth weeks of
the semester (September 12 Ð October 31), keep a journal of your reactions to,
and reflections about, field placement experiences you think are important to
your development as a clinical social worker. Over time these entries will
become a record of your preoccupations, commonly experienced problems, and
challenges.
For this assignment:
1. Make
entries into a journal on a weekly basis, focusing on any of the following:
a. Your
intervention practices (successes, failures, preferences),
b. Aspects
of clinical practice that consume or charge your energy,
c. Types
of clients that trigger your sense of competence or self-doubt,
d. Your
experiences with supervision or interprofessional practice, and
e. Any
other issues significant to your professional development
Limit
the length of your entries to one or two pages per week (these may be typewritten
or neatly handwritten).
2. Use
the journal as the basis for a paper in which you, through description
and analysis, develop one or two major issues relevant to your
learning as a clinical social work practitioner. Be sure to convey the process
of your thinking with regard to each issue (how it changed or evolved) during
the eight-week period.
3. The
journal must be turned in but will be a minor consideration in the grading. You
may hand in your journal at intervals, if you wish, and I will read and comment
on its content and themes.
At least six citations must be integrated
into this assignment, and at least two must be from sources other than the
textbooks.
Evaluation criteria:
Completeness
of the journal 15%
Presentation
of themes
30%
Reflective
and analytic capacity 30%
Quality
and use of citations 15%
Quality
of presentation 10%
(Due by November 21)
This assignment
requires two students to work together in the production of a 50-minute
videotape, simulating an intervention with a real or hypothetical client in
which ego psychology, cognitive, behavioral, or cognitive-behavioral techniques
are utilized. The assignment must be completed in the following way:
1. Select a type of client and a problem or
challenge faced by the client. One student must portray the worker and the
other student must portray the client.
2. Prepare and record a 50-minute
intervention session (you are not required to turn in a script). The
intervention strategies used must be drawn from one of the theoretical bases
noted earlier. Do not mix theories for this assignment. Conduct the session without
third-person commentary.
3. Turn in a short write-up along with the
video, including:
a. An introduction to the setting and the
client (one page)
b. A rationale for using your approach with
the particular client (one page)
c. Notations indicating where particular interventions are being used
on the tape (using ÒminuteÓ and ÒsecondÓ indicators as guideposts)
d. A critique of the intervention, including
its strong and weaker points (one page)
e. Where you will go from here with the
client (if you plan to meet with the client again) (one-half page)
f. Three annotated references other than
course texts that support your use of the intervention strategies with the
client.
No one but
myself will see the video, and I will return it after the assignment is graded.
Both students will be given the same grade, as I will assume that you
participated equally in the process.
This is not
intended to be a professional quality session! I only want to see if you can
use good judgment in applying classroom material to a clinical session.
Evaluation
criteria:
Completeness
of the videotape 10%
Justification
of the approach
15%
Suitability
of the intervention strategies 40%
Critique
and follow-up plan 25%
Quality and use of references 10%
(5-7 pages long, due November 14)
This assignment option provides you with
an opportunity to investigate a special area of your interest in more depth
than might be possible with the other semester assignments.
1.
First,
select a specific clinical practice topic area. Examples from my past students
include the use of object relations therapy with clients who have borderline
personality disorder, empirically validated interventions for clients with
post-traumatic stress disorder, and the importance of the clinical relationship
with clients who have schizophrenia. You need to share your topic idea with me
in advance so that I can help you to focus it.
2.
The paper
will consist of 12 paragraphs. In the first paragraph you need to a) introduce
the topic, b) state the nature of your interest in it, and c) explain why it is
relevant to clinical social work practice in general.
3.
Conduct a
literature review of related articles or book chapters (no books, please) until
you have what you believe to be twelve (10) substantive citations. I have no
preference for how you go about searching for sources - I only expect that they
will be of good quality. If you wish, you can share one or two citations with
me for my reactions.
4.
For each
citation (which should be presented APA style at the beginning), write one
paragraph in which you a) describe its most important points, and c) describe
what you learned from it.
5.
The closing
paragraph should consist of a) a summary of your major points of learning, and
b) areas of further learning in the topic area that will be important to you.
Evaluation criteria:
Quality
of citations 35%
Quality
of descriptions 20%
Ability
to describe your learning 20%
Summary
points 15%
Quality
of preparation and writing 10%
(5-7 pages long, due December 10)
This assignment requires that you select
one of the major theories addressed in this course - ego psychology (perhaps
featuring object relations theory), cognitive theory, behavior theory, or the
combined cognitive/behavior theory - and apply it to a practice situation with
which you are presently or have recently been involved, or have worked with in
a past field practicum or job. Your client system may be an individual, family,
or group. Please address the following:
1. Define
clinical social work practice within your setting, and state if and how
this theory, as used there, is consistent with the values of the social
work profession (1 page).
2. Provide
a theory-driven problem statement and assessment of the client
system (individual, family, or group). This should include a rationale for how
the problem occurred, based on the theoryÕs concepts and nature of problems
that the theory suggests (2 pages).
3. Formulate
an intervention plan that includes goals, intervention strategies, and criteria
you and the client system will use to determine whether the problem is
resolved.
4. Summarize
your intervention activities to this point (and the outcome, if the
intervention is complete) (2-3 pages)
Remember that all theories include
assumptions about human nature, the nature of problems, and the nature of
change. Be sure to address the impact of diversity, if relevant (age,
race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status), on your
work with the client system.
At least six citations are required for
this assignment, and at least three must be from sources other than the
textbooks.
Evaluation criteria:
Thoroughness
of theory description 20%
Quality
of assessment 20%
Quality
of intervention plan 20%
Quality
of intervention 20%
Quality
and use of citations 10%
Organization
and presentation 10%
(Featuring the poetry of Emily Dickinson)
Specific practice application topics for each class session will be determined by student interest
Important note: The instructor
reserves the right to make changes in the course calendar if he deems it
necessary. Any changes will be announced in class.
August 29 Introduction
to the Course
ÒI
dwell in possibility -
A
fairer house than prose -
More
numerous of windows -
Superior
- for doorsÓ
ÒPre-affiliationÓ
activities
Course
overview
September 12 Ego
Psychology I
ÒGrowth of Man - like Growth of Nature -
Gravitates
within -
Atmosphere,
and Sun endorse it -
But
it stir - alone ÐÒ
Defining clinical social work practice
Characteristics of effective
practitioners
Overview of ego psychology
Intervention technique:
Exploration/Description/Ventilation
Reading: Goldstein
Ð Introduction, 2, 8 (166-176)
September 19 Ego
Psychology II
ÒA
Charm invests a face
Imperfectly
beheld -
The
Lady dare not lift her Veil
For
fear it be dispelled -
But
peers beyond her mesh
And
wishes - and denies -
Lest
Interview - annul a want
That
Image - satisfies -Ó
Major
concepts of ego psychology
Ego
Functions (and ego mastery)
Processes
of coping and adaptation
Intervention
technique: Person-situation reflection
Basic
models of group intervention
Readings: Goldstein
Ð 3, 5
Reid
1, 2 (30-38)
September 26 Ego
Psychology III
ÒThe Soul unto itself
Is
an imperial friend -
Or
the most agonizing Spy
An
Enemy - could sendÓ
Defense
Mechanisms
Ego
assessment
Intervention
technique: Developmental reflection
Therapeutic
factors in group intervention
Readings: Goldstein
Ð 4, 7
Reid
- 3
October 3 Ego
Psychology IV
ÒCould
mortal lip divine
The
undeveloped Freight
Of
a delivered syllable
ÔTwould
crumble with the weightÓ
Object
relations
The
client-worker relationship
Intervention
techniques: Sustainment, Education
The
person as group member
Readings: Goldstein
Ð 6 (113-130), 9
Reid
- 5
October 10 Ego
Psychology V
ÒTell all the Truth but tell it slant -
Success
in Circuit lies
Too
bright for our infirm delight
The
TruthÕs superb surprise
As
lightning to the Children eased
With
explanation kind
The
Truth must dazzle gradually
Or
every man be blind - Ò
Diverse and oppressed populations
Intervention
techniques: Direct Influence, Partializing
The
social worker in the group
Readings: Goldstein
Ð 10
Reid
- 6
October 17 Ego
Psychology VI
ÒEach that we lose takes part of us;
A
crescent still abides,
Which
like the moon, some turbid night,
Is
summoned by the tidesÓ
Special
populations Quiz
#1 tomorrow
Group
development
Readings: Goldstein
Ð 11
Reid
- 4
October 24 Social
Work Roles in Psychopharmacology
ÒThe Heart asks Pleasure - first -
And
then - Excuse from Pain -
And
then - those little Anodynes
That
deaden suffering -Ó
Group
intervention skills I Concept
Paper due
Readings: InstructorÕs
handouts
Reid
- 7
October 31 Cognitive-Behavior
Theory I
ÒMuch Madness is divinest Sense -
To
a discerning Eye -
Much
Sense - the starkest Madness
ÔTis
the Majority
In
this, as All, prevail ÐÒ
Behavior
theory
Readings:
Leahy
Ð 1, 2
November 7 Cognitive-Behavior
Theory II
ÒA Deed knocks first at Thought
And
then - it knocks at Will
That
is the manufacturing spotÓ
Cognitive
theory Field
placement journal due
Readings: Leahy
Ð 3, 4
November 14 Cognitive-Behavior
Theory III
ÒYour thoughts donÕt have words every day
They
come a single time
Like
signal esoteric sips
Of
the communion wine
Which
while you taste so native seems
So
easy so to be
You
cannot comprehend its price
Nor
its infrequencyÓ
Behavioral interventions Annotated
bibliography due
Anxiety
Readings: Leahy
Ð 5, 8
November 21 Cognitive-Behavior
Theory IV
ÒA
word is dead
When
it is said,
Some
say.
I
say it just
Begins
to live
That
dayÓ
Cognitive interventions Intervention
Videotape due
Group
intervention skills II
Readings: Leahy
- 6
Reid
- 8
November 28 Cognitive-Behavior
Theory V
ÒI gained it so -
By
Climbing slow -
By
Catching at the Twigs that grow
Between
the Bliss - and meÓ
Process
of case conceptualization Quiz
#2 tomorrow
Depression
Readings: Leahy
Ð 7, 10
December 5 Cognitive-Behavior
Theory VI
ÒI made slow Riches but my Gain
Was
steady as the Sun
And
every Night, it numbered more
Than
the preceding OneÓ
Social
worker / client relationship issues
Readings: Leahy
Ð 11, 12
Written assignment #2 is due by Friday,
December 9, at 4:00 p.m. It may be delivered to my mailbox in the Raleigh
building. Papers mailed by out-of-town students must be postmarked by the due
date.
SLWK 704 SUPPLIMENTAL
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Defining Clinical Social Work
Goldstein, E. G. (1996). What is clinical
social work? Looking back to move ahead. Clinical Social Work Journal, 24(1), 89-104.
Swenson, C. R. (1994). Clinical social
work. In R. L. Edwards & J. G. Hopps (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social work
(19th ed.) (pp.
502-511). Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers.
Psychodynamic Theory Presentations
Bloom, J. (1992). The triple lens of
contemporary psychoanalytic vision. Clinical Social Work Journal, 20, 131-135.
Berzoff, J. (Ed.) (1996). Inside out and
outside in: Psychodynamic clinical theory and practice in contemporary
multicultural contexts.
Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.
Floskas, C. (1993). On the proposal of using
psychoanalytic ideas in systems theory: A discussion paper. Australian and
New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 14, 9-15.
Goldstein, E. G. & Noonan, M. (1999) Short-term
treatment and social work practice: An integrative perspective. New York: Free Press.
Pessin, D. E., & Young, T. M. (1993).
Ego psychology and self-psychology in social work practice. Clinical Social
Work Journal, 21, 57-71.
Saari, C. (1986). Clinical social work
treatment. New York:
Gardner.
St. Clair, M. (1999). Object relations
and self-psychology: An introduction (3rd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Strean, H. S. (1979). Psychoanalytic
theory and social work practice.
New York: Free Press.
Cognitive / Behavioral Theory Presentations
Bandura, A. (1978). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Burbach, D. J., Borduin, C. M., &
Peake, T. H. (1988). Cognitive approaches to brief psychotherapy. In T. H.
Peake, C. M. Borduin, & R. P. Archer (Eds.), Brief psychotherapies:
Changing frames of mind
(57-84). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Granvold, D. K. (Ed.). (1994). Cognitive
and behavioral treatment: Methods and applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Hawton, K., Salkovskis, P. M., Kirk, J.,
& Clark, D. M. (Eds.) (1998). Cognitive behaviour therapy for psychiatric
problems. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Martin, J. I. (1993). Self psychology and
cognitive treatment: An integration. Clinical Social Work Journal, 21, 385-394.
Mattaini, M. A. (1997). Clinical
practice with individuals.
Washington, DC: NASW Press.
Reid, W. J. & Epstein, L. (1972). Task-centered
casework. New York:
Columbia University Press.
Other Theories and General Topics
DeJong, P. & Miller, S. (1995). How
to interview for client strengths. Social Work, 40, 729-736.
Durst, D. (1994). Understanding the
client/social worker relationship in a multicultural setting: Implications for
practice. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 3, 29-41.
Frankl, V. E. (1988). The will to
meaning: Foundations and applications of logotherapy. New York: Meridian.
Garvin, C. D. & Seabury, B. A.
(1997). Interpersonal practice in social work. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Germain, C. B. & Gitterman, A.
(1996). The life model of social work practice: Advances in theory and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Columbia University
Press.
Golan, N. (1978). Treatment in crisis
situations. New York:
Free Press.
Karls, J. M. & Wandrei, K. E. (Eds.)
(1994). Person-in-environment system: The PIE classification system for
social functioning problems.
Washington, D. C.: National Association of Social Workers.
McMillen, J. C. (1992). Attachment theory
and clinical social work. Clinical Social Work Journal, 20, 205-218.
Perlman, H. H. (1979). Relationship:
The heart of helping people.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Safran, J. D. & Greenberg, L. S.
(Eds.) (1991). Emotion, psychotherapy, and change. New York: Guilford.
Saleeby, D. (1996). The strengths
perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. Social Work,
41, 296-305.
Sexton, T. L. & Whiston, S. C.
(1994). The status of the counseling relationship: An empirical review,
theoretical implications, and research directions. The Counseling
Psychologist, 22(1),
6-78.
Practice Applications
Allen-Meares, P. (1995). Social work
with children and adolescents.
New York: Longman.
Anechiarico, B. (1990). Understanding and
treating sex offenders from a self-psychological perspective: The missing
piece. Clinical Social Work Journal, 18, 281-292.
Appleby, G. A. & Anastas, J. W.
(1998). Not just a passing phase: Social work with gay, lesbian, and
bisexual people. New
York: Columbia University Press.
Beckett, J. O., Dungee-Anderson, D., Cox,
L., & Daly, A. (1997). African Americans and multicultural interventions. Smith
College Studies in Social Work, 67,
540-561.
Berger, S. M. (1993). Chronic fatigue
syndrome: A self psychological perspective. Clinical Social Work Journal, 21, 71-84.
Bolton, C. & Camp, D. (1989). The
post-funeral ritual in bereavement counseling and grief work. Journal of
Gerontological Social Work, 13(3/4),
49-59.
Bramblett, R., Wodarski, J. S., &
Thyer, B. A. (1991). Social work practice with antisocial children: A review of
current issues. Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 15, 169-182.
Briere, J. (1996). Therapy for adults
molested as children: Beyond survival (2nd
ed.), New York: Springer.
Caple, F. S., Salcido, R. M., & di
Cecco, J. (1995). Engaging effectively with culturally diverse families and
children. Social Work in Education, 17(3), 159-170.
Cohen, B. (1985). A cognitive approach to
the treatment of offenders. British Journal of Social Work, 15, 619-633.
Constable, R., Flynn, J., & McDonald,
S. (Eds.) (1996). School social work: Practice and research perspectives. Chicago, Ill: Lyceum.
Croyle, R. T. (1992). Appraisal of health
threats: Cognition, motivation, and social comparison. Cognitive Therapy and
Research, 16, 165-182.
Culbertson, R. (1995). The case for
social work. The Hospice Journal, 10, 21-22.
Davis, M., Eschelman, E. R., & McKay,
M. (1988). The relaxation and stress workbook. New York: New Harbinger Publications.
Efron, D., & Moir, R. (1996).
Short-term co-led intensive group work with adult children of alcoholics. Social
Work With Groups, 19,
117-127.
Eldridge, N. S., Mencher, J., &
Slater, S. (1993). The conundrum of mutuality in psychotherapy: A lesbian
dialogue. Wellesley, MA:
Wellesley Centers for Research on Women.
Gallagher, M. M., Leavitt, K. S. &
Kimmel, H. P. (1995). Mental health treatment of cumulatively/repetitively
traumatized children. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 65(3), 205-237.
Goldapple, G. C., & Montgomery, D.
(1993). Evaluating a behaviorally based intervention to improve client
retention in therapeutic community treatment for drug dependency. Research
on Social Work Practice, 3,
21-39.
Goldberg, M. (1995). Substance-abusing
women: False stereotypes and real needs. Social Work, 40, 789-798.
Hendricks, J. (1995). The meaning of
reminiscence and life review.
Amityville, NY: Baywood.
Kurtz, L. (1987). Three approaches to
understanding self-help groups. Social Work with Groups, 10, 69-80.
Lee, M. Y. & Greene, G. J. (1999). A
social constructivist framework for integrating cross-cultural issues in
teaching clinical social work. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(1), 21-37.
Lewchain, S., & Sweeney, S. (1997). A
developmental approach to the group treatment of adult children of alcoholics. Alcoholism
Treatment Quarterly, 15,
51-62.
Littrel, J., & Mazel, D. (1991). The
influence of self concept on change in client behaviors: A review. Research
on Social Work Practice, 1,
46-67.
Lukton, R. C. (1992). Gender as an
element in the intersubjective field: The female therapist and male patient. Clinical
Social Work Journal, 20,
153-167.
Mishne, J. M. (1996). Therapeutic
challenges in clinical work with adolescents. Clinical Social Work Journal,
24(2), 137-152.
Morgan, K. S. (1997). Why lesbians choose
therapy: Presenting problems, attitudes, and political concerns. Journal of
Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 2(1),
49-63.
OÕLeary, E. (1996). Counseling older
adults: Perspectives, approaches, and research. London: Chapman and Hall.
Padesky, C. A. (1988). Attaining and
maintaining positive lesbian identity: A cognitive therapy approach. Women
and Therapy, 8(1/2),
145-156.
Palmer, N. (1997). Resilience on adult
children of alcoholics: A nonpathological approach to social work practice. Health
and Social Work, 22,
201-208.
Peled, E., Eisikovits, Z., Enosh, G.,
& Winstok, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay:
Toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45(1), 9-25.
Pollice, C., Kaye, W., Green, C., &
Weltzin, T. (1997). Relationship of depression, anxiety, and obsessionality to
state of illness in anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating
Disorders, 21, 367-376.
Proctor, E. K. & Davis, L. E. (1994).
The challenge of racial difference: Skills for clinical practice. Social
Work 40(1), 65-74.
Perez-Foster, R. (1998). The clinicianÕs
cultural countertransference: The psychodynamics of culturally competent
practice. Clinical Social Work Journal, 26(3), 253-270.
Real, T. (1995). Fathering our sons;
reframing ourselves: Some thoughts on transforming male legacies. Journal of
Feminist Family Therapy, 7
(1/2), 27-43.
Riderman, E. (1992). Countertransference:
A vehicle for recognizing growth and repair in women psychotherapists treating
women patients. Clinical Social Work Journal, 20.
Ruiz, P. (1995). Assessing, diagnosing,
and treating culturally diverse individuals: A Hispanic perspective. Psychiatric Quarterly, 66(4), 329-340.
Schneider, R. L. & Kropf, N. P.
(Eds.) (1992). Gerontological social work. Chicago, Ill: Nelson-Hall.
Sheridan, M. J. & Amato, K. (1999). The role of religion and spirituality in social work education and practice: A survey of student views and experiences. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(1), 125-141.
Spence, S. (1994). Practitioner review:
Cognitive therapy with children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology
and Psychiatry, 35,
1191-1228.
Stewart, J. (2000). Becoming an advocate
for battered women. Clinician Review, 10(6), 25-30.
Thorin, E. J., & Irvin, L. K. (1992).
Family stress associated with the transition to adulthood of young people with
severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe
Handicaps, 17, 31-39.
Thyer, B. A. & Wodarski, J. S. (Eds.)
(1998). Handbook of empirical social work practice, volume 1: Mental
disorders. New York:
Wiley.
Valentine, L. & Feiner, L. (1993).
Resilience factors associated with female survivors of childhood sexual abuse.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12,
3-17.
Walsh, J. (1995). Sexual abuse,
suicidality, and survival: A clinical case management approach. In J. Kanter
(Ed.), Clinical studies in case management. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 65, 71-84. San
Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Williams, E. E. & Wilson, F. (1996).
Culturally informed social work practice with American Indian clients:
Guidelines for non-Indian social workers. Social Work, 41(2), 147-151.
Wodarski, J. S. & Thyer, B. A. (Eds.)
(1998). Handbook of empirical social work practice, volume 2: Social
problems and practice issues.
New York: Wiley.
Yager, J. (1994). Psychosocial treatments
for eating disorders. Psychiatry, 57, 153-162.