Population and the Environment
 
(The Pololu Valley on the island of Hawaii-- an example of pristine environment)
 
 
   Back to Table of Contents 
 
 Links to related web sites: 
Drylands:  The Aral Sea
The United Nations Homepage
U.S. Census Homepage
Internet Population Resources
Family Planning councils of America
 
 
 
Contents
Introduction
Demography
History of Population Studies
Some Basic Foundations of Demography 
Demographic Measures
The Demographic Transition
Ecology
The POET Scheme
 
 



Introduction:  Population and the Environment
 
    The basic theme here is the relationship between population growth and natural resources.-- Too much growth strains our supplies of natural resources; the struggle for increasingly scarce resources further strains our social existence.  Competition between the east and the west; developed and developing nations-- involves (to a large extent) conflict over limited resources.  (Even for such "unlimited" resources as nuclear energy, there is intense debate-- Chernobyl is an example-- because of the potential damage that can be inflicted on the environment).
     
      For example, the United States with approximately 6 percent of the world's population, consumes about 35 percent of the world's resources in energy and minerals.
 
Return to Chapter Contents

Demography:  The study of Human Population
 
     Demography is the scientific study of population size, composition, and distribution.
      It examines both population STRUCTURE and population PROCESS.
     
       STRUCTURE refers to
      • size of population
      • composition of population
        • age and sex characteristics
        • racial and ethnic characteristics
      • distribution of people within a territory
       
      PROCESS refers to growth, decline, and movement
       
      • fertility-- birth rates
      • mortality-- death rates
      • migration-- movement from one locality to another
 
Return to Chapter Contents


History of Population Studies:
 
    Demography is not new: From antiquity rulers needed information about their subjects, usually it was very simple information-- a head count, or "CENSUS"
      For example: the number of able-bodied men who could fight in the army; the number of subjects who could be taxed; etc.
       
      We find several occasions in the OLD TESTAMENT describing censuses counting and registering people, e.g.
       
        Numbers 1-- (At Mt. Sinai when the Israelites left Egypt)
         
        Ezra 2-- (At the end of the 40-years wandering of the Jews)
         
      The NEW TESTAMENT also refers to a census
       
         Luke 2:1-- The emperor Augustus ordered a census of the empire for tax purposes. This is why Joseph and Mary went to Bethlehem-- to be counted in this census.
 
Return to Chapter Contents


Some Basic Foundations of Demography
     
    Ibn Khaldoun (1332-1406): Arab social philosopher living in the 14th century studied population and developed a cyclical theory of population growth.

     
    John Graunt (1600's): British haberdasher and clothier took an active interest in population in the 1650's and studied fertility, mortality, and migration by amassing data from church parish records on christenings, births, deaths, and burials. He published a study (1652) listing his findings:

      • In the city of London, deaths exceeded births. In the surrounding countryside the opposite occurred.
      • The number of males at birth exceeded the number of females. (This is the sex ratio at birth).
      • He computed a mortality table for the city of London.
      • He discussed migration, fertility, and mortality as components of population growth.
    Graunt's avid interest in population studies eventually lead to the failure of his business and break-up of his marriage. (He died in debtor's prison).
     

    Edmond Halley (1656-1742), British Astronomer,  also dabbled in demography producing a life-table for Breslau, Germany.
     

    Thomas Malthus:  The most lasting and noted contributions have been made by an English clergyman, Thomas Malthus (1766-1834) who published his ESSAY ON THE PRINCIPLE OF POPULATION in 1798. In this work he outlined what has come to be called, the "Malthusian Dilemma."
     

      • Food production increases arithmetically-- 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, etc.
      • Population has the potential to increase geometrically-- 1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256, 512,1024....etc. Starting with one amoeba, for example, you can end up with 67,108,864 in just 27 generations.
    According to Malthus, there are only two ways to avoid this--
      • The PREVENTATIVE CHECKS; (Birth control through abstinence-- Remember, Malthus was a clergyman).
      • The POSITIVE CHECKS; (famine, war, pestilence, etc.)
 
    Karl Marx (1818-1883) never a demographer, wrote an influential response to this argument stating that it was basically capitalist propaganda designed to further subjugate the working classes by limiting their population growth and political power. Under socialism and communism, there would be more efficient modes of organization that would distribute wealth more fairly throughout society. There would be no shortages of food and natural resources according to Marx, if his model of social organization were adopted.
 
Return to Chapter Contents

Measures of Fertility, Mortality, and Migration:
 
     Fertility:
      Crude Birth Rate (CBR): the number of live births per 1000 population in a given year (usually the population at mid-year serves as the basis).
       
        It is "crude" because it takes the entire population into account, not just the "population at risk" or women who are in the child bearing ages of 15-44.
       
        It ignores the age structure of a population.
         
      General Fertility Rate (GFR): the number of live births per year to women aged 15-44 per 1000 women aged 15-44 years old in the population.
        Example: CBR, USA (1992) was approximately 16 (16 per thousand population). GFR, USA (1991) was approximately 70 per thousand women aged 15-44 years old in the population.

        Further example: During the Great Depression (1935) in the USA, fertility was low and the CBR was 19; In 1967 after the baby boom (1946-1965), fertility was high, but the CBR was less (18)! (Does this mean that women were having more babies during the Depression? No! Why not? The population, in 1967 was filled by young baby boomers who had not had their children. Compare GFR and we are not mislead: GFR, USA (1935) = 78; GFR, USA (1967) = 88.

     
      Total Fertility Rate (TFR): the number of live births to a woman over her child bearing years. In USA (1993) TFR = 2.0 births. (In 1982 it was 1.8; in 1955 it was 3.6. In Ethiopia it is over 7).
 
    MortalityFirst, we need to distinguish MORTALITY from MORBIDITY. MORBIDITY refers to measures of disease and illness in a population. They can be very specific, e.g. the incidence of AIDS in a population. Don't confuse morbidity with MORTALITY or the actual deaths that occur.
      Crude Death Rate (CDR)-- the number of deaths per 1000 members of a population. (In 1991, the U.S. had a CDR of 9 per thousand population).

      Age-Specific-Death Rate-- the number of deaths per 1000 members of a SPECIFIC AGE GROUP in a given population.

      Infant Mortality Rate-- This is regarded by many as the best overall indicator of a society's level of general health. It is defined as the number of deaths to infants (less than 1 year old) per 1000 live births in a given population. The infant mortality measure also is a good indicator of a population's future growth rates.
       

        But this may not operate in a "common sense" or "logical" way. For example low infant mortality would lead one to conclude that a population has a high rate of growth since more infants will survive, eventually reaching the point where they will have children themselves. However, looking at world data, we find that high infant mortality rates are accompanied by very high birth rates and populations that grow faster.
          Example:  The USA: Infant mortality rate = 8.8 (1992)-- (Rate of natural increase .6 percent); Mexico: Infant mortality rate = 29 (1991)-- CBR = 29 (Rate of natural increase 2.4 percent) Given these growth rates, it will take Mexico approximately 29 years to double its (1991) population of 90 million. (The USA would require 116 years to double its population with a rate of natural increase equalling .6 percent per year). [The "Law of 70"] However, our actual growth rate is 1.1 percent (due to immigration which yields a doubling time of 64 years).
 
    Migration:
     
      The Crude Net Migration Rate-- the net number of migrants in a year per 1000 people in a population. [((Total number of in-migrants minus the total number of out-migrants)/ total midyear population) multiplied by 1000.
 
Return to Chapter Contents


The Demographic Transition:
 
    Historically, this refers to the gradual decline in birth and death rates that occurred during the period from the late 1700's to the mid 1900's in the industrialized (western) world.
      Death rates fell slightly more quickly than birth rates, leading to a growth in population.
      This growth was spread over a longer period of time (150+ years) while the world still had plenty of frontier for colonization. This lessened the impact of population growth.
     
      Modernizing countries (the third world), however, have undergone this process in a much shorter time period (1920's to the present) resulting in an explosive growth of population at a time when the world's frontiers have dwindled. This has placed tremendous pressure on the environment.
       
    The demographic transition has been divided into 3 stages:
     
      • High Birth Rates/High Death Rates
      • Declining Death Rates/High to Moderate Birth Rates
      • Low Birth Rates/Low Death Rates
    Population pyramids (good illustrators of a population's age and sex structure) can be applied to a nation's stage in the demographic transition.
 
Return to Chapter Contents


Ecology:
 
    Ecology is the scientific study of the relationship between organisms and their environment.  Modern environmentalism differs from conservationism of the past.  Environmentalists are really ecologists in that they emphasize the impact of changes in population, technology, and social organization on the environmental system.
     
      Example:  Build a coal-fired power plant in Tennessee and all states down wind from it will be impacted
       
    Conservationists see the environment as a series of independent and isolated areas. (Land is set aside and "conserved" for future use).
     
      Example: set aside a part of the forest while permitting extensive logging in another part. (Environmentalists concerned with the impact of logging on the environment as a whole).
 
Return to Chapter Contents


The "POET" scheme:
 
    This is an ecological model-- (functionalist)-- that emphasizes the interrelationship between four variables-- Population; Organization; Environment; and Technology:  According to the Malthusian model, the population "explosion" will have dire consequences on the environment.  Marxists argue that changing the form of social organization from capitalism to communism could control the impact of population growth on the environment.  (History has not supported this claim as Marxist societies have abyssimal environmental records; e.g. the former Soviet Union).

    Thus far, the "green revolution" representing advanced technology in food production has enabled food supplies to keep ahead of population growth. (The horrible famines of recent in Africa resulted from politics involving food distribution, not a shortage of food supplies). Technology also has been used to develop cheap and effective methods of birth control which can be used to control population growth. Technology also increases the amount of damage that can be inflicted on the environment-- nuclear power is the most often cited example.
     
     

                            Organization

         
        Population                           Environment
         

                             Technology

 
    Sociologists argue that "Social Organization" is a critical variable in this model.  As previously mentioned, famine is just one social problem caused by politics, not a lack food. The use of birth control is another issue where a safe, effective technology exists, but politics determines whether or not a society will endorse it. The environment, itself, has become an intensely political issue-- if social groups do not resolve their differences regarding the environment our future prospects may be dim, indeed.

    Finally, it may appear that the environment is treated as the dependent variable in this model-- this is not the case.  Major environmental changes will have a tremendous impact on all the remaining variables in the model.  ("El Nino" is a very recent example of a global environmental condition that has had a very significant impact on human living conditions).   For example,  we are very close to knowing for certain whether or not a "green house" effect is already under way-- (the green house effect is currently regarded as a "political issue" by many of those holding power in our society). If such a phenomenon does occur, we are bound to see an intensification of efforts to counter its effects. (We've already placed restrictions on industrial emissions, automotive exhausts, coolants like freon, etc.)

    The former Soviet Union provides an example of how human engineering on a massive scale can disrupt the environment with diversion of water flow into the Aral Sea and the nuclear disaster at Chernoybl.

    Links to related web sites:
    Drylands:  The Aral Sea

 
Return to Chapter Contents