Return to Syllabus

Return to Lectures

 

 

 

Notes to Accompany Chapter 7 of Ritzer (McDonaldization)

"The Irrationality of Rationality"

 

 

I.          Purpose of Chapter:

 

A.                 "...McDonaldization leads to inefficiency; unpredict­abili­ty; incalculability; and loss of control."

 

B.                 "Most specifically, irrationality means that rational systems are unreasonable systems-- they serve to deny the basic humanity, the human reason, of the people who work within them or are served by them. In other words, rational systems are dehumanizing systems.  Whereas the terms rationality and reason are often used inter­changeably in other contexts, here they are employed to mean antithetical phenomena." (p. 121)

 

1.                  Question: Is this always true or can rationality actually enhance human reason and "basic humani­ty"?

 

II.        Ritzer gives some examples of the "lesser irrationalities" of inefficiency.

 

A.                 Long lines of people (and cars at drive-thru windows) at fast food restaurants.

 

1.                  McDonalds and grocery store checkouts may be out­fitted with television receivers so people can do something else while waiting in line.

 

B.                 The Japanese "just-in-time" parts delivery system causes all kinds of traffic problems as the delivery trucks clog highways at all times during the day.

 

C.                 ATMs that are designed to save time, avoid long lines at bank windows, have long lines themselves and then charge customers for certain kinds of transactions.

 

1.                  To me, this is a weak criticism given the fact that ATMs are open 24 hours a day and are much less likely to have lines of people in front of them than are tellers' windows.

 

D.                Grocery Super Stores with countless isles containing tens of thousands of different products.

 

1.                  Ritzer argues that these stores can hardly be efficient as shoppers walk miles in search of an item.

 

E.                 Ritzer also claims that McDonalds and other fast food restaurants suffer from low productivity if computed according to the number of workers hired.

 

1.                  They can tolerate this low level of efficiency because of the low wages that they offer, but eventually turn more and more to "sophisticated technologies" to replace workers or make them more productive.

 

F.                  Another claim that Ritzer makes is that "Those at or near the top of [organizations like McDonalds]... want their own positions to be as free of rational con­strai­nts  --as non-rational-- as possible.  They need to be creative, but creativity is not desired form underlings in the organization."

1.                  But this is inconsistent with all the TQM that is presently out there in industry, and Ritzer clear­ly fails to address quality circles and the role of worker input to the company.

 

2.                  There are clearly two ways that Ritzer could go with this argument-- the first would be to acknow­ledge the role of TQM in industrialized society; the second would be to argue that even those at the top of the pyramid are constrained by ratio­nality.

 

a.                  For example, it could be argued that since society is almost entirely rationalized, fast food restaurant owners become prisoners them­selves-- always struggling to keep ahead of the competition-- thinking up new products (or new ideas to market the same old prod­uct).

 

(1)               Isn't this now characteristic of Ameri­can industry, in general.  Think of your own work loads-- how have they in­creased?  Is the pace of your work more frenetic today than it was 5 years ago?

 

(2)               Even among college teachers-- there's a move away from the tenure system (which is regarded as inflexible and ineffi­cient in some circles) toward periodi­cally renewable contracts. 

 

(3)               College graduates face similar pressure-In the past just having a degree was enough to get a job-- now its difficult to find one even with a Ph.D.

 

b.                  [I'm saying that Ritzer could have been a lot more rigorous in his argument, but has failed to do so].

 

G.                Fast food restaurants are still expensive with compared to what you could cook at home.

 

1.                  Disney World was cited as another example of "Ex­pense World."

 

2.                  Ritzer says, "If it really isn't efficient, and it really isn't cheap, then what does the fast-food society and, more specifically, the fast food restaurant offer us? Why has it been such a world­wide success?"

 

a.                  Ritzer claims that it offers us the "illu­sion" of efficiency and economy.

                                   

(1)               It also offers us "fun"-- an amusement park for food, with Ronald the clown, and a whole host of cartoon characters.

 

(2)               Many restaurants now have playgrounds for kids.

 

(3)               In fact grocery stores, malls, etc. all have an amusement park atmosphere. They have to in order to compete with each other-- think of all the activities that Malls sponsor to draw customers-- an­tique shows, car shows, Halloween par­ties, etc.

 

(a)               The ultimate in "amusement malls" is the Mall of America in Blooming­ton, Minnesota.

 

b.                  Actually, he has a point when describing the trend towards "fun foods." (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles cereals, etc.

 

H.                The food itself has been described as "salty candy." [I was surprised that McDonalds puts both salt and sugar on its fries].

 

I.                   Entertainment has become a theme underlying almost every facet of society, from the news media to eating.

 

III.       "The unhealthy industry"

 

A.                 Whole industries are now in the business of producing and marketing unreality.  [Is this different from 100 years ago with quack remedies, cocaine Coca Cola, and spiritualists?]

 

1.                  "McDonalds creates the illusion that we are hav­ing fun, that we are getting lots of French fires, and that we are getting a bargain when we purchase a meal."  Other examples:

 

a.                  Sizzlean is made out of beef and turkey, kosher bacon has no pork.

b.                  Molly McButter and Butter Buds have no but­ter, [and the list goes on...Ritzer neglects to mention that people don't want the choles­terol and bad stuff in butter, but they do want the "real butter taste."]

 

IV.       The "homogenization" of the country (and the world)

 

A.                 Ritzer claims that McDonaldization eliminates diversity and establishes a pattern that other cultures imitate, themselves--e.g. the French "Croissanterie."

 

1.                  [But, I would argue that placing a McDonalds in Paris actually increases the ethnic diversity of the food found in that city, (although I'm not certain that I would want to call it American Cuisine)].

 

2.                  [There's another argument to be made here, also.  The diversity of ethnic restaurants all over Amer­ica has actually increased in recent times, due to the influx of more immigrants from eastern coun­tries-- you can even see this in the Richmond Area.  All this has happened despite McDonalds.]

 

V.        Demystification, Deprofessionalization, and Assembly-Line Medicine:

 

A.                 [This is a repeat and reinforcement of what has been said earlier].

 

1.                  [I'm not so sure that medicine has been "demys­tified."  In fact, with all the new machines and cures available today, doctors have managed to retain their aura of magician/healer (and maybe even increase it).

 

2.                  [With regard to dehumanization of the medical prac­tice-- doctors now take courses in patient rela­tions and management-- partly as a result of crit­icism leveled against them in the past for being so impersonal and treating patients like a piece of meat.]

 

VI.       Factory-Like Universities, Bureaucracies, and Planes that Almost Fly Themselves.

 

A.                 Here Ritzer is referring to larger classes; television professors, and the like.  [Actually, from a personal standpoint, I can agree with much of what he says.  College deans under pressure from faculty to reduce teaching loads, but unable to budget the hiring of new faculty often seek a solution by enlarging classes.  This seemingly rational solution produces some very irrational consequences-- huge classes filled with constantly talking (or sleeping) students and a very muddled learning environment.

 

B.                 With regard to bureaucracy-- Ritzer needs to say much more, for it is within the context of the bureaucracy that dehumanization really occurs.

 

C.                 [More importantly, Ritzer seems to miss the consequenc­es of depersonalization in our everyday lives-- fami­lies that don't spend time together: If they are to­gether it is in front of the TV; not eating together; not interacting with each other;  kids who interact more with machines-- computer games and the internet-- than face-to-face.  People (and machines) saturating us at mealtimes with phone calls selling things we don't need, asking for charitable donations, etc. (We now have electronic devices (caller ID and answering ma­chines) that help us screen unwanted calls).  The list goes on...]

 

VII.     Wholesale irrationality and the environment

 

A.                 Ritzer laments over our increasingly oil-dependent society; the proliferation of polluting automobiles and unsightly highways; the alienation of assembly line work;

 

1.                  These, he claims are examples of a rational system that "has produced a seemingly never-ending string of irrationalities."  [As wasteful and polluting as the automobile is, it is ironic that it has become the symbol of adulthood, freedom and indi­viduality in our society-- The driver's license has become a "right of passage," to lose it is to curtail ones freedom-- (perhaps because mass tran­sit is inadequate).

 

            VIII.    Finally, Ritzer's conclusion at the end of Chapter 7:

 

A.        "Thus is the argument of this text that contrary to McDonald's propaganda, and the widespread belief in it, fast-food restaurants and their rational clones are not reasonable, or even truly rational, systems. They spawn problems in the health of their customers and the well being of the environment; they are dehumanizing and therefore, unreasonable; and they often lead to the opposite of what they are supposed to create, for example, leading to inefficiency rather than to in­creased efficiency."

 

 

Top of Page