Some
Notes to Accompany Chapter 4 of Ritzer (McDonaldization)
I. Purpose
of Chapter:
A. This
chapter seeks to explain the meaning of calculability to a McDonaldized
society.
B. Review:
Four elements of formal rationality:
1. Efficiency:
"...the choice of the optimum means to a given end." Bureaucracy is the best way to coordinate
the distribution of vast numbers of resources over great distances to large
numbers of people. Ritzer's example of
the IRS is one good example; the military is another.
2. Calculability:
Bureaucracies organize tasks into easily calculated bits and pieces that can be
measured and quantified. Therefore it
is easy to measure work output.
3. Predictability:
Bureaucracies remove uncertainty by "well-entrenched rules and regulations"
that try to cover as many contingencies as possible.
4. Control:
Bureaucracies exert a lot of control over people (and the social
environment). To do this, they employ
non-human technology; rules and regulations defining behavior in each office;
restricting the type of goods and services (options) available;
II. "McDonaldization involves an emphasis on things that cam be calculated, counted, quantified. It means a tendency to use quantity as a measure of quality. This leads to a sense that quality is equal to certain, usually (but not always) large, quantities of things."
A. I
don't know if this tendency to quantify things is innate to human nature or
whether it is fostered by social structure-- eg. children love to count things;
parents get into deep trouble if they give one child a bigger slice of cake,
etc., than the other.
B. Ritzer's
point is that McDonaldization reinforces our tendency to quantify things and
determine merrit by numbers rather than qualities.
1. We
quantify everything from animal intelligence-- (I actually saw an animal I.Q.
ranking some time ago)-- to wealth--(Forbes's 500 wealthiest people)
2. The
general attitude becomes; "more is better; bigger is better"
a. One
might think that weight is an exception to this, but even here, we quantify in
terms of the number of pounds lost.
III. Examples
of quantification (from Ritzer):
A. Signs
touting the "billions and billions" of McDonald's burgers sold. (Social Proof-- the burgers must be good
because so many people are buying them).
B. Product
names like "Big Mac;" "Big Gulp;" "Big Foot;"
"Whopper;" etc., in the fast food industry impart the notion that the
customer is getting more value for the dollar.
1. You
can also see the same tactics used on the shelf at the grocery store--
"Value Packs," etc.
C. Ritzer
argues that McDonalds and its competitors ignore quality factors for
quantity-- see quote on the bottom of page 63-- but I think he's wrong on this
count. McDonalds and its Madison Ave
minions are far too clever for this.
Remember the campaign, "Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce,
cheese, all on a sesame seed bun?"
1. The
industry is certainly intelligent enough to include quality as a selling point.
2. However,
this doesn't mean that quality wins out over efficiency. There's a great quote
from Col. Sanders about the company that bought out his business in 1964: (See
p. 64).
a. "That
friggin'...outfit... They prostituted every goddam thing I had. I had the
greatest gravy in the world and those sons of bitches they dragged it out and
extended it and watered it down that I'm so goddamn mad."
D. Presentation
of the food is such that everything is arranged to look BIG. There are even special scoops and bags for
the fries that make them spread out and look abundant. (Eat at a gourmet restaurant-- food presentation
is artful the portions actually look skimpy).
1. Does
the customer actually get a good value at a fast food restaurant? Ritzer begrudgingly allows that they
probably do give the customer more food for less money, but the mark-ups range
from 400 to 600 percent over just the cost of the food.
E. Speed
of service is also something that can be calculated. Modern industrial society is a reflection of speed-- in
transportation, work, and even travel vacations-- 12 countries in 10 days!
(Not my idea of a qualtiy vacation...)
1. Burgers
must be served fast; service at Pizza Hut is guaranteed in five minutes or the
meal is free; home delivery used to be guaranteed in 20 minutes until delivery
people started having accidents.
F. Ritzer
also talks of the pricision with which every component of fast food is
measured-- the burger must have a slightly larger diameter than the bun; Arby's
roast beef sandwiches must have 3 ounces of meat; etc.
G. Precise
measurement gets carried over into weight reduction programs, where precise
caloric intake is monitored (including cholesterol, and fat), as well as the
amount of pounds gained or lost.
H. Television:
shows are evaluated by the numbers of viewers they draw-- (Nielsen
Ratings). Do the Nielsen Ratings
reflect the quality of the programming?
PBS programs are widely regarded as being high in quality, but their
viewing audience is limited.
1. The
ratings game has become so sophisticated that it can target segments of the
population that spend lots of money
2. The
TV time-out (I'm not sure what this has to do with quantifiability; but it does
show the power of television to change sports when money is concerned).
I. Sports,
themselves have always been highly quantifiable with individual and team
scoring averages, etc. (Ken Burns' series on baseball is one example). Ritzer claims that now, with the advent of
more acccurate timers, quantification in sports has reached even higher levels.
(There is one exception-- during the 94 olympics when Nancy Kerrigan tied with
Oskana Byoul (sp?) they gave the medal to Oskana because artistic merit has
weight over technical merit.
1. On
the other hand the shot clock in basketball has forced an increase in the tempo
of both college and pro basketball.
Ritzer claims that "...a `run and shoot' style of basketball fits
will in the McDonaldized `eat and move' world of dinners purchased at
drive-through windows and consumed on the run." (p. 72)
2. Ritzer
maintains that they have also tried to pick up the pace of Baseball with
"liver" balls, astro turf, and the designated hitter.
J. Quantification
has also taken on a greater role in the world of education-- GPA's PSAT's,
SAT's, GRE's, MEDCATs, LSAT's, etc.
1. Colleges
and Universities, themselves are periodically ranked.
2. Degrees
also serve as a means of quantifying one's education--BA; MA; PhD; LLD; etc.
3. Teachers
are also ranked and rated on quantitative systems at the end of the semester.
4. Lists
of publications also serve to measure a professor's worth, along with the
prestige level of the journal they are published in. (Surprisingly, some low
-quality articles appear in the more prestigeous journals!)
K. In Medicine profit-making medical organizations have encouraged physicians to quantify their health care provisions in ways that can be easily reported and evaluated.
IV. Note Ritzer's treatment of F. W. Taylor's paper on increasing worker output in loading pig iron.
V. Finally,
all this increase in calculability would not be possible without the
computer. It makes one wonder what's
driving the beast. Is it our increased
capacity for calculation (via computers) that is causing us to quantify more
and more of our lives? Or, is McDonaldization
driving our desire for more statistics-- causing us to invent the computers
that manage the numbers?