For Exams II and III, you will be asked to find a research article related to the topic covered by the exam and to write a summary of some aspect of interest to you. The summaries will be turned in along with the first page of the article and will constitute 15% of the grade for these exams. Note the critical words in the description above, "interest to you". You are asked to find articles that intersect with the genetic subjects under consideration and connect with your peculiar psychological makeup. Many of you may be tempted to search databases using keywords such as "tRNA", "translation", "genetic code", etc. More likely, however, you are interested not in these topics but in "breast cancer", "tooth decay", or "marmosets". Find articles that relate the topics discussed in class to those important in your life.
Finding an article
Problems understanding article?
How to write the summary
How not to write the summary
Back to: Genetics Home, Course
at a glance?
How do I find an article? You are seeking a research article (not news, not review) that addresses a subject covered by the current exam. A research article can be recognized by its presentation of actual experimental results and a description of the methods used to obtain them. There are a few general approaches you might employ to find what you want, and I imagine that you will avail yourself of all of them at one time or another.
How do I write a summary of a research article? Your summary should consist of three short paragraphs (if you can organize it differently and still get the job done - great!).
How not to write a summary. Do not succumb to the temptation to just paraphrase the authors' words. "After all," you might say, "the authors know what they are talking about and I do not." That may be true, but confusion is a temporary condition and you must not let it drive you to the bottle of sleeping pills. We chose this image deliberately, because paraphrasing is, in a sense, intellectual suicide. You are removing yourself from the creative process. Quoting is no better, so don't do it. Use your own words to mold the information from the article into a coherent story that another person can follow. Since your goals in writing a summary are different from the authors' goals in writing the full-sized article, it is inconceivable that a readable summary could be formed from bits and pieces of the article, any more than you could construct a hummingbird by piecing together the parts of a falcon. It is a struggle to understand the article and find your own story - it will always be a struggle, though it does get easier with practice. Realize that it is a worthwhile struggle. You gain by a firmer connection with what you read. We gain by hearing a new story rather than a rehash of a story we already have. Here is an example of a bad summary.