BNFO 301 
Introduction to Bioinformatics
Course at a Glance: Feedback
Spring 2012 

Feedback -- How? How much?
Feedback is the reason we have not remained moderately complex organic molecules in a primordial soup, and feedback plus spirited enterprise is a hard combination to beat as a strategy to increase your abilities. You will have a lot of feedback in this course. The spirited enterprise is up to you.

Feedback will take the form of extensive comments on exams, problem sets, and project reports -- anything that you hand in. In addition, for roughly the last third of the semester, Wednesday classes will be canceled. In their place, I will meet weekly with each of you individually or in small groups, both to help you make progress on your research projects and to deal with whatever other difficulties may arise.

Grading
Grading is something different from feedback. It is an attempt to shoehorn into very few categories what is a diverse set of experiences. Individually tailored feedback can address the diversity. Grading cannot. Grades are based on a model of authority that is antithetical to the process of science: I define the answer and you don't. I define the value of what you have done and you don't. The premise of the process of science is that no one knows the answer... to anything. And everyone is equally entitled to put forth an explanation that may reasonably organize what has been observed.

I will not quantify that which is unquantifiable nor assign any grade until forced to do so by the powers that be, i.e. at the end of the semester (and that grade will be either pass or fail). I find that objectifying humans exacts from me a psychic cost, leaving me with less time and energy to do things for the class that would be more valuable. So I won't do it. However, I will notify you the moment the thought crosses my mind that you are heading for an ultimate failing grade. If you are not notified, then you have never handed anything in to me that would cause such concern.

But at the end of the semester, the beast must be fed, and I'll do something. It is against my nature to do any task, even the most trivial, in an arbitrary fashion, so whatever grade emerges will be based somehow on my perceptions gathered over the semester, particularly from my observation of what you became able to do by the end.

Here's what I could look at come the end of the semester:

Problem Sets and
Study Questions?
Not much. Problem sets and study questions lie at the heart of this course. Much time will be spent in class on them, and I expect that you'll spend even more time out of class. I encourage you to hand in your responses to problem sets, particularly to those questions you're unsure about ...but in the end problem sets are like scratch paper -- means to an end. Why do them? See the discussion of exams). Your work will certainly be looked at, and you'll get lots of comments... but no grades.
 
Questionnaires? No. Questionnaires are very valuable to me, and maybe to you, but that's it.
 
Exams? Yes. Exams will not be given letter grades, but you will get considerable feedback, and I'll certainly consider them carefully at the end of the semester.
 
Research Project? The research project -- in its written form and the final symposium presentation -- will weigh a lot, a whole lot in my mind. After all, a major aim of the course is to enable you to conduct a legitimate research project (broadly interpreted) and present its results.
 
Attendance? No. Slavery was abolished more than 100 years ago. Come and go as you think best.
 
Class Discussion? No. Discussion is important to make this course work, but it isn't graded.

How will I know where I stand in class?
Considering the detailed feedback you will get for every exam and for some other assignments and considering our individual meetings, you should gain a pretty good idea of my views. Your time, like mine, would be better spent worrying less about where you stand on an arbitrary five-level scale and worrying more about how to get to where you would like to stand in your life.

Why so... different from everyone else?
It's possible, perhaps likely, that most classes you've taken here and elsewhere have not embraced the same philosophy concerning grading, but what I described is actually a viewpoint that many hold besides myself, for example:

Butler R, Nisan M (1986). Effects of no feedback, task-related comments, and grades on intrinsic motivation and performance. J Educ Psychol 78:210-216.

Dahlgren LO, Fejes A, Abrandt-Dahlgren M, Trowald N (2009). Grading systems, features of assessment and students' approaches to learning. Teaching Higher Educ 14:185-194

Duckworth E (1978). The having of wonderful ideas. Harvard Educ Rev 13:108-122". (password required)

Harlen W, Crick RD (2003). Testing and motivation for learning. Assessment in Education 10:169-207.

Kohn A (1994). Grading: The issue is not how but why. Educational Leadership 52:38-41.

Pollio H, Beck H (2000). When the tail wags the dog: Perceptions of learning and grade orientation in, and by, contemporary college students and faculty. J Higher Educ 71:84-102.