- Guidance for Presenters
- Guidance for Panelists
- Schedule of Panels
A. Guidance for Presenters
(see How to Prepare for a Panel for further advice)
- Where and When: See Schedule
Presenters should be in the room at least 5 minutes before the time of their panel. Non-presenters (and panelists) are welcome at any time.
- Duration of presentation: Up to seven minutes and no more. At six minutes, you'll hear a courteous tinkle of a bell. At seven minutes, a bone-shaking clang will stop your presentation if it has not already concluded. If you're in the middle of a sentence, you'll be permitted to complete the sentence (with no more than one conjunction), but that's it.
- Duration of question and answer period: Up to eight minutes, marked by a bell. Questions will be posed by the panel concerning the presentation and the written proposal.
- Loading presentations: There won't be time to download your presentation. It must be on the computer before the panels begin. This can be done in either of two ways:
- E-mail your presentation to me by 15 minutes before the beginning of the panel
- Bring your presentation on a memory device by 15 minutes before the beginning of the panel
Do not expect to download it from your e-mail or upload it on the spot from your memory device.
B. Guidance for Panelists
- Reviewers: Each proposal has been assigned a primary reviewer and a secondary reviewer, noted in the schedule. The primary reviewer will begin the discussion after the presentation. All panelists are invited, nay, urged to join in as well.
- Goals of the proposal: Please see How to Write a Research Proposal to see the goals presenters were asked to address. If you like, you can also take a look at an example of a proposal.
- Goals of presentation: Please see How to Give a Presentation Focused on an Experiment to see the goals presenters were asked to address.
- Goals of the course: The primary goal of the course was to bring students into the scientific process of approximating truth, giving due weight to what has been observed, limited by how it was observed, and distinguishing observation from mere assertion.
- Goals of the review process: Please consider whether the proposal and presentation has addressed the general goals of the course and the specific goals of presentations and proposals. For example, a generally useful question would be "How do you know that [some assertion] is true?". If the proposal and presentation does not make clear that the presenter understands the principle behind the proposed experiment, you might through probing questions give the presenter an opportunity to display (or perhaps discover) such understanding.
- Feedback: The eight minutes of questioning will by itself provide valuable feedback to the presenter. You're certainly invited to provide written feedback as well. Presenters have until Sunday, May 15, to revise their proposals, if they wish.
- Thanks: Please accept them for the bracing experience you've given fledgling molecular biologists.
C. Schedule of Panels
Panel I: Tuesday, May 10, 9:30 - 10:30 AM. Life Sciences Building Room 253
(see map)
Panelists: James Lister, Joyce Lloyd, Ann Rice
Panel II: Wednesday, May 11, 9:30 - 10:30 AM. Harris Hall Room 3112
(see map)
Panelists: John Bigbee, Vlad Vladimirov, Wenheng Zhang
Panel III: Wednesday, May 11, 4:00 - 5:00 PM. Harris Hall Room 3112
(see map)
Panelists: Gail Christie, Bernice Huang, Maria Rivera
Panel IV: Thursday, May 12, 4:00 - 5:00 PM. Harris Hall Room 3112
(see map)
Panelists: Teshell Ponteen Greene, Allison Johnson, Glen Kellogg
Panel V: Friday, May 13, 11:30 - 12:30 PM. Harris Hall Room 3112
(see map)
Panelists: Billy Budd, Stacey Wahl, Greg Walsh
Panel VI: Friday, May 13, 1:00 - 2:00 PM. Harris Hall Room 3112
(see map)
Panelists: Keith Baker, Nathalie Houssin, Dorne Yager
|