These goals were to be achieved through
means you can
review in detail.
Please consider whether they
helped you achieve the stated goals of the course:
-
The classroom experience
Look back on the on-line notes (example),
companions (example),
experiment simulations (example)
-- all done (in theory) outside of class, followed by discussions in class driven by responses to questionnaires (example). Consider:
- Few people bought into this idea. While I'm convinced that in theory it is
a far better strategy to attain the goals of the class than lecture,
in practice... well, it wasn't often put in practice.
- After the October 2 exam, fewer and fewer people came to class. I take that
as prime evidence that most people judged that going to class was not the best use of
their time.
- Even fewer people attempted the simulations until the week of the exam.
The name of this course is "Molecular Biology Through Discovery" in large part because of these simulations.
- I would very much like a theory that is put into practice, class activities that
are so worthwhile that class is worthy of your time, and discovery simulations
that actually promote discovery, because people actually engage in them and discover (or, failing that, some other route that achieves the course's goals). I wonder how
to get there. Attempt to compel them? That would work against one of the
main goals of the course. Besides,
you should know better than I the best use of your time.
Your thoughts?
- Results vs conclusions
The focus on primary research articles throughout the semester, supplemented by
exercises in class,
the summary of an experiment,
the research proposal, and constant harping throughout the semester,
was an attempt to help you see the difference between results and conclusions and
to develop strategies that enable you to cope with confusion, a necessary ability
to gain from reading articles.
Your thoughts?
- The research project
I saw this as an opportunity to view research as something more than science fairs,
to see how questions are raised by prior experimental results, and -- most important --
to engage in a scientific dialogue with a mentor who sees science not as a classroom
lecture but rather a lifelong calling.
I tried to spread the activity over the
semester, but for many this didn't appear to happen.
- What did you gain from the written research proposal and from the presentations?
- What did you gain from the panel discussion of your proposal?
- Few people mounted a sustained effort starting from August 28 (when the
time line for
the proposal was first discussed) to the end of the semester. Most relied on a burst of creative
activity during the last week or two.
- More than a few mentors commented on the scarcity of meetings suggested by their mentees.
Your thoughts?
- Help and feedback
Most problem sets you turned in resulted in extensive feedback from Nick.
He also had regular (and often extra) help sessions. I met with you individually
during each of the last two exams. I also provided written feedback for the first two
exams (but not the last), your summary of an experiment, and drafts of your proposals and presentations.
There was also feedback during class. How did this work for you? Did you feel you had
adequate opportunity to get the help and feedback you needed?
Your thoughts?
-
What advice would you give someone entering the class?
-
Three things you'd advise that this class never to do again?
-
Three things you'd advise that this class keep doing at all costs?
-
Three ideas that would make the course better for those that come after you?
(I know... make shorter questionnaires)
- Did you get what you wanted out of the course? If so, what? If not, what did you miss?
Do you feel more proficient in some way? If so, how?
What if anything do you think will still be
with you from the course in five years?