This is the first time either of us (or anyone else at this school) has given this course. We have found your comments helpful throughout the semester, and we would like to benefit from your current, most mature opinions, those that come from looking back on the journey you have just completed. You have the standard questionnaire from the College of Arts & Science, but that form must ask only general questions. We would like to ask for your help on more specific issues.
This questionnaire is totally anonymous. Since the web site is outside of Blackboard (notice that you did not log in), your name will not be attached to your responses.
Space has been provided for comments regarding each item of the questionnaire, and you're highly invited to share your thoughts in words. Despite the apparent size of the boxes, there's no space limit.
The opportunity to serve those students who will come after you is no doubt reward enough, but to show our appreciation for your efforts, we will pay you 10 points on the fourth exam for your time. To gain this token of our gratitude, simply answer "yes" to the question that will appear on your exam: Have you completed the on-line questionnaire and turned in the standard evaluation?
Content of the course
This course was intended to fulfill the field of study requirement in symbolic reasoning. If you're unfamiliar with what that requirement is, click here. Please bear this goal in mind as you answer the following questions.
1. The Book: Few courses are devoted to a single book (biblical studies excluded), so an obvious question is whether Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, and Bach was worth the attention we lavished on it.
2. Immediate goal: We chose to focus only on that part of the book aimed at understanding Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem.
3. Topics:
a. What topics do you find particularly interesting?
b. What topics seemed useless at the time but you now realize have made you a Better Person?
c. What topics still seem useless?
4. Auxiliary topics: Art (Escher) and Music (Bach), for better or worse, could not be a primary focus of this course if understanding Godel's Incompleteness Theorem were to remain our primary goal. Still, we did manage to get a few notes in.Consider these excursions with respect to their intrinsic interest and their utility in shedding light on the logical elements of Gödel's theorem.
a. Did you find the art examples: Select One Interesting but not useful Interesting AND useful Neutral Neither interesting nor useful A colossal waste of time
b. Did you find the musical examples: Select One Interesting but not useful Interesting AND useful Neutral Neither interesting nor useful A colossal waste of time
5. Workload:
a. What do you think of the amount of work asked of you for class? Select One Excessive A bit heavy Neutral A bit light Too little
b. What do you think of the amount of work you actually did for class? Select One Excessive A bit heavy Neutral A bit light Too little
c. How many hours outside of class do you estimate you spent on reading, notes, study questions, and problem sets (PER CLASS)? Select One 0-1 hr/class 1-2 hr/class 2-3 hr/class more
6. Long term goal: To the bottom line...
METHODS OF ACHIEVING COURSE GOALS
7. Learning aids: Which of the following did you find useful in gaining the insights you needed?
8. The GEB web page: Did it meet your needs?
14. Feedback on Exam:
General 15. Team teaching:
16. Your bottom line -- What's hot: What do you like most or feel most satisfied about your experience? In what ways do you think your experiences in GEB will be helpful in the near future or over the long term?
17. Your bottom line -- What's not: What do you like least or feel least satisfied about your experience?
18. Any particular comments/suggestions to Mike?
19. Any particular comments/suggestions to Jeff?
20. Comments you'd like to make that don't fit anywhere else: