Back To Main                                          

                                                                           
                                                LEARNING THEORIES



DIFFERENTIAL ASSOCIATION THEORY
EDWIN SUTHERLAND

While criminal behavior is an response to societal institutions and values, it is not explained by those societal institutions and values since all members of the society do not engage in criminal behavior.

Deviance and crime are conflicts of values that are expressed in social norms and criminal law

Criminal behavior is learned (rather than invented, imitated or rooted in individual constitution).

The process of learning criminal behavior by association with criminal and anti-criminal patterns involves all of the mechanisms that are involved in any other learning.

Criminal behavior is learned in social interaction (through the process of interpersonal communication).

The specific direction of motives and drives is learned from definitions of the legal codes as favorable or unfavorable.

A person becomes criminal when the social interactions in which they participate produce a preponderance of
definitions favorable to violation of law relative to definitions unfavorable of violation of law.

The principal part of the learning of criminal behavior occurs within intimate personal groups (primary groups such as family, friendship networks, peer groups).

As criminal behavior is learned, the learning process includes

 

Techniques of committing the crime, which vary from simple to complex

The specific direction of motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes.

Learning motives, drives, rationalizations, and attitudes is more important than learning techniques to engaging in criminal behavior because it produces a willingness to engage in crime.

Interpersonal associations vary in frequency, duration, priority, and intensity.

Most individuals are not criminals because their anti-criminal associations are greater in frequency, duration, and intensity than their criminal associations.

 


 

BECOMING A HOUSE PROSTITUTE

BARBARA HEYL

House Organization

 

Provide a variety of girls

Support services – cooks, maids, bouncers

Basic orientation to prostitution learned from

 

Pimp

Prostitutes

Madam

Apprenticeship (2-3 months)


Physical skills and strategies

 

Learning sexual services

Learning defensive sexual strategies

Preventing intimacy


Checking client for STDs

 

Social and identity skills

Choosing an alias

Conversational skills

Dealing with specific clients

Dealing with categories of clients

Hustling

Learning rules of the house

 

Hygiene and grooming

Acts and price

Limit competition and jealousy

Honesty with clients

Dealing with arrest

 


 

BECOMING A MARIHUANA USER

HOWARD BECKER

Steps in defining marihuana smoking as a pleasurable experience

 

Learning the proper smoking technique to produce real effects=

Being able to recognize the effects of being high

Attributing the effects of being high to marihuana

Learning to treat the effects of marihuana as enjoyable

 


BECOMING A INDEPENDENT HIT MAN

KEN LEVI

 

Independent hit man lacks the justifications available to syndicate killers

Organization as a Profession to neutralize stigma of murder

 

Contract based on difficulty of hit and desire of contracting party

Developing and maintaining a reputation

Acquiring skill in the use of weapons

Learning to kill involves overcoming the disorientation of confronting an "innocent person" who is usually unknown to the hit man

Developing a "cold heart" in killing situations

Maintaining detachment from victims

Create an instrumental orientation toward the hit

 

Treating hits as "jobs," "assignments,"

Treating individuals as "targets"

Emphasizing strategies, planning, techniques, skills, schedule

 

 


 

REINFORCEMENT THEORY

RONALD AKERS

GENERAL PRINCIPLES

Most behavior is learned according to the principles of operant conditioning.

 

Operant – voluntary, capable of being influenced by stimulus events that follow them.

Respondent – reflex, involuntary, contingent upon antecedent stimuli, unaffected by outcomes

Operant behavior has a functional relationship with stimulus events. It is developed, maintained, and strengthened (or the reverse) depending on the feedback received from the environment.

The basic process in operant learning is that stimuli following a behavior determine the probability of its future occurrence.

The stimuli following a behavior take the form of either reinforcement or punishment

Reinforcement – a response-contingent stimulus has the effect of strengthening the probability of the response

 

Positive Reinforcement – Adding rewards

Negative Reinforcement – Removal of unpleasant or painful conditions

Punishment

 

Positive Punishment – Adding punishers

Negative Punishment – Removing a reward or privilege

See overhead on reinforcement/punishment

Given two alternative acts, the one that is reinforced the most, more frequently, and with the higher probability will be maintained.

Learning is most dramatic and effective when alternative acts are incompatible and one is reinforced and the other punished or not reinforced.

Whether a stimulus is reinforcing depends on the individual, time, place, context

In addition to reinforcers and punishers there are discriminative stimuli. These are stimuli that are present when the behavior is reinforced (physical surroundings, one’s own feelings, one’s own and others’ spoken words. Social reinforcers delivered through normative statements are significant discriminative stimuli.

Discriminative stimuli that typically accompany reinforcement or punishment signal actors to expect reinforcement or punishment.

Discriminative have no independent reinforcing value but do increase or decrease the probability of behavior recurring.

APPLICATION TO DEVIANT BEHAVIOR

Deviant behavior is learned both in nonsocial situations that are reinforcing or discriminative and through that social interaction in which the behavior of other persons is reinforcing or discriminative for such behavior.

The principal part of the learning of deviant behavior occurs in those groups which comprise of control the individual's major source of reinforcements.

The learning of deviant behavior, including specific techniques, attitudes and avoidance procedures, is a function of the effective and available reinforcers and the existing reinforcement contingencies.

The specific class of behavior which is learned and its frequency of occurrence are a function of the reinforcers which are effective and available, and the deviant or nondeviant direction of the norms, rules, and definitions which in the past have accompanied the reinforcement.

The probability that a person will commit deviant behavior is increased in the presence of normative statements, definitions, and verbalizations which have acquired discriminative value for behavior in the process of differential reinforcement of such behavior over conforming behavior.

Types of discriminative stimuli that facilitate deviant behavior

 

Those that define deviant behavior as desirable or permissible

Those that define deviant behavior that others condemn and the individual initially defines as wrong as justified, excusable, necessary, the lesser of two evils. These are important in cases where an individual must initially overcome moral resistance to a deviant act.

The strength of deviant behavior is a direct function of the amount, frequency, and probability of its reinforcement. The type or organization of deviance is important in so far as it affects the source, amount, and scheduling of reinforcement.

 


 

HOMOSEXUALITY

Generic Sexual Behavior


Potential of the sex drive is biologically dictated but strength and direction are not

Control of sexual behavior everywhere is linked to the structure of relationships and customs surrounding marriage and kinship

Universal institutional priority is given to heterosexual behavior between adults within marriage

Only unbridled and unprincipled sexual promiscuity is universally condemned

These broad parameters of control leave great room for diversity of sexual behavior and of designation of sexual deviance

Learning Sexual Behavior

Physiological ability to be sexually aroused and obtain orgasm are inborn but most aspects of sexual behavior are learned

Only some of all possible sexual stimule are socially valued. Social control and conventional sex training are meant to insure that objects to which people learn to respond sexually and methods of sexual gratification they learn to prefer are within socially acceptable limits

Culture provides differential availability of sexual stimuli and thus affects the probability certain actions have of being sexually reinforced.

Social rewards are set up for reaction to acceptable sexual objects and employment of approved methods. Punishment or ignoring of disapproved objects and methods


Conditions associated with approved sexual objects and methods

They are more likely to be suggested verbally and through imitation as a way of gaining sexual pleasure

The reinforcement of intrinsic physiological pleasure is intensified by social reinforcement

There is less chance that positive reinforcement will be offset by adverse social reaction

Social Learning in Gender Identification and Sex Role Behavior

Socialization is the most significant way society directs sexual behavior

Whether individual acts and identifies self as male or female is primarily determined by the sex roles to which they are assigned and learn to play

The high correlation between behavioral patterns and biological sex is based on the fact that others use physical signs to define and react to individuals as male or female

Parents very early distinguish between and react differently to boys and girls


Sexual Socialization

Initial socialization and later social controls are effective enough to guarantee majority heterosexuality

 

There is effective isolation from deviant alternatives

There is a pattern of experienced rewards for conforming sexuality and punishment for deviant alternatives

Sexual socialization may lead to deviation in two ways

 

Parents or others may provide direct reinforcement for deviant behavior

Parents or others may conduct heterosexual socialization in such a way that the individual is ill prepared for normal sexual behavior

 


 

NEUTRALIZATION THEORY

GRESHAM SYKES AND DAVID MATZA

Conventional and deviant beliefs are held simultaneously by almost everyone. While certain groups may be influenced by one more than the other, both determine behavior to a considerable degree.

Deviance does not reflect attitudes and values that conflict with those of conventional society. Deviance is the product of learned justifications that situationally and temporarily neutralize internalized conventional attitudes and values that serve as inner controls

Conventional norms are relatively flexible and loose. Various justifications are accepted by society for occasional violations of social norms. Even some violations of law can be legally justified (age, self defense, necessity, insanity, lack of criminal intent)

Deviants continue to recognize the legitimacy and moral rightness of the conventional social order. They simply extend society’s acceptable justifications for the violation of societal norms.

Neutralization techniques counteract feelings of guilt and preserve self-concept

TECHNIQUES OF NEUTRALIZATION

Excuses -- Accounts that admit the inappropriateness of the behavior while denying full responsibility

 

Accident – deviance is due to forces outside the individual’s control

Defeasibility – deviance is due to loss of individual control

Biological Drives – deviance is due to overwhelming of individual control

Scapegoating – deviance is due provocation undermining individual control

Justifications -- Accounts that emphasize the positive aspects of actions in certain circumstances

 

Denial of Injury – deviance is rationalized as not causing harm

Denial of Victim – deviance is rationalized as involving rightful retaliation

Condemnation of Condemners – deviance is rationalized by criticizing motives or character of accusers

Appeal to Loyalties – deviance is rationalized by invoking responsibilities to higher priority norms

Sad Tale – deviance is rationalized by invoking deprived circumstances

Self Fulfillment – deviance is rationalized by invoking individual rights

 


 

CONVICTED RAPISTS’ VOCABULARY OF MOTIVE

DIANA SCULLY AND JOSEPH MAROLLA

Two types of rapists

 

Admitters – accounts essentially the same as police and victim reports

Deniers – accounts are significantly different from police and victim reports

Two types of accounts given by rapists

 

Justifications – accept responsibility for the act but deny that it is wrong

Excuses – admit the act was wrong or inappropriate but deny full responsibility

Justifications

 

Women as seductresses

Women say no but mean yes

Most women relax and enjoy rape

Nice girls don’t get raped

Act was only a minor wrong doing

Excuses

 

Influence of drugs and alcohol

Emotional problems

Nice guy image



BONDING THEORY

TRAVIS HIRSCHI

Individuals do not learn to become deviant, they learn not to become deviant.

Deviance is most likely when bonds to society are weak.

Individuals are likely to engage in deviance if they have few countervailing attachments when the invitation for deviance is presented.

Four Types of Bonds Promoting Conformity


Attachment

 

To conventional individuals and institutions

Commitment

 

Investment in conventional lines of action

Involvement

 

Devotion of time and energy to conventional activities

Belief

 

Moral belief in the rules of conventional society